ALBT no longer trades under that ticker. AllianceBlock rebranded to Nexera and migrated the token to NXRA, which is why price sites either show nothing for ALBT or show a stale figure.

CoinGecko’s internal id for the asset is still allianceblock-nexera, which is the clearest confirmation you will get that these are the same project.

Checked 6 August 2026: NXRA sits around rank 2,227 by market cap.

What actually happened

AllianceBlock was a project building compliance-focused infrastructure for tokenised assets. It renamed itself Nexera and ran a token migration: holders swapped ALBT for NXRA.

A migration is not a price event in itself. It is an identity event — the ledger entry you own gets replaced by a different one.

The expensive part: the old contract still exists

This is what almost no “ALBT price” page tells you.

A migration does not delete the old token. The original ALBT contract stays on chain forever. It can still be transferred, and anyone can still create a pool for it.

So a buyer who searches the old ticker, finds an old contract address in an old article, and buys it on a decentralised exchange ends up holding a token the project no longer supports and may no longer honour for swapping.

How that goes wrong in practice

  • Old articles and old wallet entries keep the retired address in circulation.
  • Anyone can seed a small pool for the retired token, so a price appears.
  • The chart looks like a low-cap asset rather than an abandoned one.
  • Migration windows often close, so the swap route may no longer be open.

Check the migration status with the project before touching any contract carrying the old ticker.

How to tell a rebrand from a dead project

Both look identical from a price page that returns nothing. The difference is easy to establish:

  • Search the old name, not the old ticker. Aggregators usually keep the old name in the asset’s id or in an “also known as” field. That is how allianceblock-nexera gives the game away.
  • Look for a new ticker with a similar market cap and an older inception date than the rebrand.
  • Check the project’s own channels for a migration notice, including the deadline and the official new contract address.
  • Confirm the new contract on a block explorer before swapping anything.

Does the rename change the investment case?

No, and treating it as though it does is a common mistake in both directions.

A rebrand changes the name, the ticker and usually the narrative. It does not change the revenue, the users or the token supply schedule unless the project also changed those, which is a separate question you have to check separately.

The useful comparison is before-and-after on the numbers that are not marketing: supply, holders, activity. Reading a coin page covers which ones to pull.

What we could not verify

We did not verify whether the ALBT to NXRA swap window is still open, the exact terms of the migration, or the current state of the project’s products. Those come from the project, not from an aggregator.

What to do next

If you hold something labelled ALBT, check the contract address in your wallet against the official Nexera contract before you do anything else. If it does not match, you are holding the retired token and need the project’s migration instructions, not a price chart.

If you were researching a purchase, search NXRA instead, and check the supply and volume figures on the new ticker rather than carrying over anything you read about the old one. On-chain basics covers the metrics that survive a rebrand.

Educational content only, not financial advice, and not a recommendation to buy or avoid any token. Figures checked 6 August 2026 via CoinGecko. Migration details must be confirmed with the project itself. Disclaimer